56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

BFGoodrich AdvantageObere-Mittelklasse
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Firestone Roadhawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
14
3
3
6
Optimale Position
#8
#2
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
13.4
3.3
3.7
4.7
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
40
34
146

Nass

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Nassleistung
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Seitenführung
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Trockenleistung
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
58%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%

Komfort

Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%

Kosten

Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich