56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
14
10
4
3
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.6
6.0
12.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
188
104
111
40

Nass

Nass
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Nassbremsen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Handling - nass
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kreisbahn nass
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Nassleistung
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Seitenführung
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Schnee

Schnee
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Schneetraktion
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Schnee Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Schnee Slalom
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Trocken

Trocken
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Handling - trocken
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Trockenleistung
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Kosten

Kosten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kilometerstand
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Komfort

Komfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Komfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Innengeräusche
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Offroad

Offroad
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich