59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Bridgestone Ecopia EP25 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Bridgestone
Ecopia EP25
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
4
30
4
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
3.8
2.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
8
111
47
36
68
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Bridgestone Ecopia EP25 Michelin e.Primacy Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Falken e.Ziex Continental PremiumContact 7 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.