59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Cooper CS7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Cooper
CS7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
18
7
4
6
4
Optimale Position
#15
#2
#1
#1
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
15.0
3.3
6.1
4.4
12.0
2.3
3.8
Neuester Test
2022
2026
2024
2026
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
71
40
47
158
111
63
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Cooper CS7
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Nassbremsen
Cooper CS7
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Handling - nass
Cooper CS7
36%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
89%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Aquaplaning - quer
Cooper CS7
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Kreisbahn nass
Cooper CS7
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Cooper CS7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Trockenbremsen
Cooper CS7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Cooper CS7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Außengeräusch
Cooper CS7
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
89%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Cooper CS7 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Michelin Primacy 5 Michelin e.Primacy Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Falken e.Ziex %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.