59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Dayton Van gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Dayton
Van
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
18
13
4
6
4
1
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
4.3
3.8
2.3
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2026
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
18
47
123
36
63
40
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Dayton Van Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Michelin Primacy 4+ Falken e.Ziex Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Hankook ION Evo %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.