56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Anzahl der Tests
1
14
16
Optimale Position
#12
#8
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
13.4
5.5
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2023
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
153

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich