56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Anzahl der Tests
1
14
18
10
Optimale Position
#12
#8
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
13.4
6.1
6.0
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
47
104

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich