56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Michelin
e.Primacy
Anzahl der Tests
1
2
14
4
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#8
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
1.0
13.4
12.0
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
23
153
111

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich