56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
3
4
18
2
3
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#3
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
3.3
12.0
6.1
1.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2026
2025
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
40
111
47
23
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich