59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
10
13
4
7
4
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
6.0
4.3
3.3
4.4
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2026
2025
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
109
123
40
158
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
94%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Firestone Multihawk 2 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Kumho Ecsta HS52 Michelin Primacy 4+ GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Michelin Primacy 5 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.