56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Michelin Primacy 5Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 5

8.4
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
3
18
3
3
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
12.0
3.3
6.1
3.7
4.7
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2025
2026
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
111
40
47
34
126

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich