56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Michelin Primacy 4+Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 4+

7.6
R16 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
3
1
18
13
3
3
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
1.0
6.1
4.3
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
2024
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
64
47
123
34
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich