Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

Michelin

Auch vergleichen mit

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Multihawk 2

Primacy 4+

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Anzahl der Tests

1

13

18

1

3

5

3

Optimale Position

#12

#1

#2

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

4.3

6.1

1.0

3.3

2.2

3.3

Neuester Test

2018

2025

2024

2025

2026

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

60

123

47

64

40

63

40

Nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

65%

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - quer

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

Michelin Primacy 4+

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Handling - nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

50%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - längs

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Nassbremsen

Firestone Multihawk 2

74%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Kreisbahn nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Kosten

Firestone Multihawk 2

73%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kilometerstand

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

Michelin Primacy 4+

91%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Komfort

Firestone Multihawk 2

75%

Michelin Primacy 4+

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Außengeräusch

Firestone Multihawk 2

54%

Michelin Primacy 4+

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Innengeräusche

Firestone Multihawk 2

89%

Michelin Primacy 4+

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Trocken

Firestone Multihawk 2

97%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Multihawk 2

Primacy 4+

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nass

Kosten

Komfort

Trocken

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen