Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Petlas Imperium PT515 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15

VS

Budget

Petlas

Auch vergleichen mit

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Testprofil

Multihawk 2

Imperium PT515

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Anzahl der Tests

1

5

2

3

Optimale Position

#12

#13

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

24.0

1.0

3.3

Neuester Test

2018

2024

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

60

11

23

40

Nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

65%

Petlas Imperium PT515

54%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Handling - nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

50%

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Aquaplaning - längs

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

Petlas Imperium PT515

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Nassbremsen

Firestone Multihawk 2

74%

Petlas Imperium PT515

55%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kreisbahn nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

Petlas Imperium PT515

60%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Aquaplaning - quer

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

Petlas Imperium PT515

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Komfort

Firestone Multihawk 2

75%

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Außengeräusch

Firestone Multihawk 2

54%

Petlas Imperium PT515

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Innengeräusche

Firestone Multihawk 2

89%

Petlas Imperium PT515

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Trocken

Firestone Multihawk 2

97%

Petlas Imperium PT515

46%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Firestone Multihawk 2

97%

Petlas Imperium PT515

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Kosten

Firestone Multihawk 2

73%

Petlas Imperium PT515

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

Firestone Multihawk 2

76%

Petlas Imperium PT515

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Kilometerstand

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Petlas Imperium PT515 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Multihawk 2

Imperium PT515

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nass

Komfort

Trocken

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen