59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
14
8
18
13
4
Optimale Position
#8
#3
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
13.4
5.0
6.1
4.3
3.8
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
4
153
146
47
123
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Seitenführung
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
45%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Firestone Multihawk BFGoodrich Advantage Firestone Roadhawk 2 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Michelin Primacy 4+ Falken e.Ziex %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.