59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
3
18
13
4
4
1
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
1.3
6.1
4.3
3.8
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
4
23
47
123
36
40
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - nass
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Kreisbahn nass
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Handling - trocken
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Komfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Firestone Multihawk Continental UltraContact NXT Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Michelin Primacy 4+ Falken e.Ziex GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Hankook ION Evo %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.