59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
4
21
13
4
30
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
11.9
4.3
3.8
2.3
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
4
40
165
123
36
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
86%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
70%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
64%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Firestone Multihawk GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Firestone Roadhawk Michelin Primacy 4+ Falken e.Ziex Continental PremiumContact 7 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.