59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Michelin
Primacy 5
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
10
4
7
4
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.1
6.0
12.0
4.4
3.8
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2026
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
4
40
47
109
111
158
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Michelin Primacy 5
81%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
89%
Michelin Primacy 5
68%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
94%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
74%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Firestone Multihawk GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Kumho Ecsta HS52 Michelin e.Primacy Michelin Primacy 5 Falken e.Ziex %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.