59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk
Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
2
18
8
4
1
4
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#3
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
1.5
6.1
5.0
3.3
1.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
4
54
47
146
40
66
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - nass
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Komfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Firestone Multihawk Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Firestone Roadhawk 2 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Hankook ION Evo GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.