56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Firestone RoadhawkObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
BFGoodrich AdvantageObere-Mittelklasse
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
21
14
4
3
3
Optimale Position
#2
#8
#3
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
13.4
12.0
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
164
153
111
40
34

Nass

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich