59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone TZ300a gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
TZ300a
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
4
4
18
8
4
1
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#1
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
12.0
6.1
5.0
3.8
1.0
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
13
40
111
47
146
36
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Firestone TZ300a GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Michelin e.Primacy Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Firestone Roadhawk 2 Falken e.Ziex Hankook ION Evo %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.