56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Anzahl der Tests
1
14
10
Optimale Position
#5
#8
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.0
13.4
6.0
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
104

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich