56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen GT RADIAL ClimateActive

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Anzahl der Tests
1
24
3
Optimale Position
#5
#1
#5
Durchschnittliche Position
5.0
2.7
7.3
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
151
1

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
66%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich