57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Kumho Ecsta PS71Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta PS71

8.3
R16 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Michelin
e.Primacy
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Anzahl der Tests
3
14
4
15
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
3.6
12.0
9.0
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
188
111
225

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Nassleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich