56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
3
18
14
26
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#8
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.1
13.4
2.2
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
47
153
66

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Nassleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
45%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
35%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich