Vergleich: Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Premium

Goodyear

EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

R13 – R

VS

Obere-Mittelklasse

Kumho

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Anzahl der Tests

5

10

3

18

4

Optimale Position

#1

#2

#1

#3

Durchschnittliche Position

2.0

6.0

3.3

6.1

12.0

Neuester Test

2018

2026

2024

2025

Verfügbare Größen

—

104

40

47

111

Offroad

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

85%

Nass

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Handling - nass

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

99%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Aquaplaning - quer

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Nassbremsen

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Aquaplaning - längs

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Kreisbahn nass

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Trocken

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Trockenbremsen

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Handling - trocken

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

100%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Kosten

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

56%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Rollwiderstand

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

56%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Komfort

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

52%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Außengeräusch

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

52%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy

EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Testprofil

Offroad

Nass

Trocken

Kosten

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen