59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Kmax S gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

Goodyear
Kmax S
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
18
16
4
4
7
Optimale Position
#1
#3
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
5.5
12.0
3.8
4.4
Neuester Test
2024
2023
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
153
111
36
158

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
71%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
82%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Michelin Primacy 5
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin Primacy 5
33%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
89%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
68%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin Primacy 5
53%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
94%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
74%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Goodyear Kmax S Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Michelin e.Primacy Falken e.Ziex Michelin Primacy 5 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.