59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Kmax T gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Goodyear
Kmax T
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
18
4
4
8
4
Optimale Position
#1
#3
#2
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
12.0
3.3
5.0
3.8
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
111
40
146
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Goodyear Kmax T Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Michelin e.Primacy GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Firestone Roadhawk 2 Falken e.Ziex %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.