59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Kmax T gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Goodyear
Kmax T
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
4
8
4
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#3
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.1
12.0
5.0
3.8
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
47
111
146
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Goodyear Kmax T GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Michelin e.Primacy Firestone Roadhawk 2 Falken e.Ziex %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.