57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
3
3
Optimale Position
#5
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
10.3
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
34
40

Nass

Nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich