59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas C-16 gegen Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Testprofil

Mitas
C-16
Firestone
Multihawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
18
4
6
8
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.8
6.1
3.3
2.3
2.8
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
36
47
40
63
137

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
92%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
88%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
89%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
91%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
89%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
85%
Handling - trocken
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
89%
Trockenbremsen
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
84%
Offroad
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
79%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
63%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
89%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
70%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
72%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
67%
Rollwiderstand
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
69%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Mitas C-16 Firestone Multihawk 2 Falken e.Ziex Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.