59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas C-16 gegen Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Mitas
C-16
Firestone
Multihawk 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
1
8
4
7
18
3
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.0
3.3
4.4
6.1
1.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2026
2026
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
146
40
158
47
23

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Mitas C-16 Firestone Multihawk 2 Firestone Roadhawk 2 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Michelin Primacy 5 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Continental UltraContact NXT %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.