59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas C-16 gegen Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Mitas
C-16
Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
7
8
18
3
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
4.4
5.0
6.1
1.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2026
2026
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
158
146
47
23

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
94%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Mitas C-16 Firestone Multihawk 2 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Michelin Primacy 5 Firestone Roadhawk 2 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Continental UltraContact NXT %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.