59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas C-16 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Mitas
C-16
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
21
18
4
7
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
6.1
3.3
2.3
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
47
40
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Offroad
Vertrauensniveau
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Mitas C-16 Firestone Roadhawk Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Hankook Ventus Evo %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.