59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas C-16 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Continental SportContact 7

Testprofil

Mitas
C-16
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
SportContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
18
4
4
6
17
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
3.8
3.3
2.3
1.3
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
36
40
63
124

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
89%
Continental SportContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental SportContact 7
87%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental SportContact 7
93%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental SportContact 7
96%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
89%
Continental SportContact 7
76%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental SportContact 7
82%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental SportContact 7
79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Mitas C-16 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Falken e.Ziex GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Continental SportContact 7 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.