59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas C-16 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofil

Mitas
C-16
Goodyear
Efficientgrip Compact
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
10
18
7
18
Optimale Position
#10
#2
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.0
3.3
6.0
6.1
4.4
6.1
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2026
2024
2026
2024
Verfügbare Größen
42
40
109
47
158
47

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
81%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
82%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
94%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
68%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Mitas C-16 Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Kumho Ecsta HS52 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Michelin Primacy 5 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.