59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas E-09 gegen Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Mitas
E-09
Firestone
Multihawk 2
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
14
1
18
4
4
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.3
1.0
6.1
3.8
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
8
60
532
66
47
36
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Komfort
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Offroad
Vertrauensniveau
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Trockenbremsen
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Mitas E-09 Firestone Multihawk 2 Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Hankook ION Evo Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Falken e.Ziex GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.