59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas E-09 gegen Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Testprofil

Mitas
E-09
Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Anzahl der Tests
1
13
4
6
4
23
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
4.3
3.3
2.3
3.8
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2026
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
8
60
123
40
63
36
192

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
89%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Offroad
Vertrauensniveau
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
82%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
58%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
89%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Komfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Mitas E-09 Firestone Multihawk 2 Michelin Primacy 4+ GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Falken e.Ziex Bridgestone Potenza Sport %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.