59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas E-09 gegen Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Mitas
E-09
Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
7
4
18
6
30
1
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#2
#1
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
4.4
3.3
6.1
2.3
2.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2026
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
8
60
158
40
47
63
68
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin Primacy 5
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin Primacy 5
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
70%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Mitas E-09 Firestone Multihawk 2 Michelin Primacy 5 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Continental PremiumContact 7 Hankook ION Evo %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.