59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas EF-10 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Mitas
EF-10
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
18
4
4
14
7
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
3.8
3.3
5.5
2.3
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
1
47
36
40
700
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Offroad
Vertrauensniveau
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Mitas EF-10 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Falken e.Ziex GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 Hankook Ventus Evo %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.