58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas MC50 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Turanza 6 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Mitas
MC50
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
18
4
16
7
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
3.3
6.0
2.3
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
11
47
40
229
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Offroad
Vertrauensniveau
Bridgestone Turanza 6
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Mitas MC50 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Bridgestone Turanza 6 Hankook Ventus Evo %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.