59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian Line gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Nokian
Line
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
6
4
18
3
8
Optimale Position
#6
#2
#1
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
12.2
3.3
6.1
1.3
5.0
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
53
40
47
23
146

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Line
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Handling - nass
Nokian Line
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Line
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Nokian Line
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Line
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Nokian Line
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Line
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Nokian Line
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
Kilometerstand
Nokian Line
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Line
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Nokian Line
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Line
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
Komfort
Nokian Line
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
43%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Nokian Line GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Continental UltraContact NXT Firestone Roadhawk 2 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.