Vergleich: Uniroyal MS plus 77 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Obere-Mittelklasse

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Ventus Evo

9.8

R17 – R22

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

Ventus Evo

Testprofil

MS plus 77

UltraGrip Performance+

Ventus Evo

Anzahl der Tests

19

23

3

Optimale Position

#3

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

11.2

3.3

Neuester Test

2021

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

76

176

60

Nass

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - quer

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Kreisbahn nass

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Aquaplaning - längs

Uniroyal MS plus 77

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Handling - nass

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Nassbremsen

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Schnee

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Bremsen auf Schnee

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Schnee Handling

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Schneetraktion

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Schnee Slalom

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Kosten

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Kilometerstand

Uniroyal MS plus 77

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Rollwiderstand

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Preis-Wert

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Komfort

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Außengeräusch

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Komfort

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Innengeräusche

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Trocken

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Trockenbremsen

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Handling - trocken

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Eis

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Eis bremsen

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Uniroyal MS plus 77 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

MS plus 77

UltraGrip Performance+

Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Nass

Schnee

Kosten

Komfort

Trocken

Eis

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen