57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Budget
VikingViking

FourTech Plus

5.6
R14 – R19
Continental UltraContact NXTPremium
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
2
3
3
3
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
1.0
3.3
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
23
40
34
40

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich