57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental SportContact 7

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
SportContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
5
3
4
18
15
Optimale Position
#9
#2
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
12.0
6.1
1.2
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2025
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
40
111
47
122

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Continental SportContact 7
95%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental SportContact 7
79%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Continental SportContact 7
70%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental SportContact 7
97%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental SportContact 7
94%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich