Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Budget

Viking

FourTech Plus

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

FourTech Plus

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Anzahl der Tests

5

4

3

2

5

3

Optimale Position

#9

#3

#2

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

3.3

1.0

2.2

3.3

Neuester Test

2025

2026

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

24

111

40

23

63

40

Nass

Viking FourTech Plus

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - längs

Viking FourTech Plus

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Kreisbahn nass

Viking FourTech Plus

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Handling - nass

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - quer

Viking FourTech Plus

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Nassbremsen

Viking FourTech Plus

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Schnee

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Kosten

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kilometerstand

Viking FourTech Plus

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Rollwiderstand

Viking FourTech Plus

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Komfort

Viking FourTech Plus

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Außengeräusch

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Komfort

Viking FourTech Plus

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Trocken

Viking FourTech Plus

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Trockenbremsen

Viking FourTech Plus

53%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Handling - trocken

Viking FourTech Plus

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

FourTech Plus

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nass

Schnee

Kosten

Komfort

Trocken

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen