56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Anzahl der Tests
5
2
14
Optimale Position
#11
#1
#8
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
1.5
13.4
Neuester Test
2021
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
32
54
153

Nass

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich