57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

BFGoodrich AdvantageObere-Mittelklasse
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Testprofil

BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
14
4
14
3
5
Optimale Position
#8
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
13.4
3.3
3.6
3.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
153
40
194
36
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Nassfahrverhalten
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Seitenführung
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Trockenleistung
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Innengeräusche
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Preis-Wert
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Best tyres for evsBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Auch vergleichen

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNBFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone RoadhawkBFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen