57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofil

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
14
1
4
6
18
Optimale Position
#8
#1
#2
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
13.4
1.0
3.3
4.7
6.1
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2026
2026
2024
Verfügbare Größen
153
66
40
146
47

Nass

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%

Trocken

Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%

Komfort

Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%

Kosten

Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Preis-Wert
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich