58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Continental EcoContact 6 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Continental
EcoContact 6
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
6
21
4
1
4
Optimale Position
#6
#2
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
11.8
11.9
3.3
1.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
679
165
40
66
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Continental EcoContact 6
51%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - nass
Continental EcoContact 6
56%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Nassbremsen
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - quer
Continental EcoContact 6
41%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Continental EcoContact 6
58%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassfahrverhalten
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Continental EcoContact 6
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Continental EcoContact 6
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Trockenleistung
Continental EcoContact 6
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Continental EcoContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Continental EcoContact 6
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Continental EcoContact 6
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Innengeräusche
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Continental EcoContact 6
99%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preis-Wert
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.